Special Council - 29 Jun 2026

City of Colwood · Mon, Jun 29, 2026 18:30 · 3300 Wishart Road Council Chambers Colwood BC

Watch the meeting Official minutes Official agenda

Summary

AI summary · check against sources

Council resumed business left unfinished after the June 22 meeting, with the mayor explaining that public comments on Colwood Creek Park were barred because its public hearing had closed. Council sent the park’s partial Agricultural Land Reserve exclusion application to the province and added a request to investigate an independent “in-trust” safeguard; the Agricultural Land Commission will decide whether to exclude the land. Council also approved a wide-ranging website improvement direction, while a proposal to impose an added governance-information standard was defeated. Other notable outcomes included a staff review of speed controls at Kelly Road, a divided vote to study low-maintenance treatments for traffic circles and cul-de-sac islands, and a land-use bylaw sent back to staff over concerns about road widening and building-height limits.

Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.

What was discussed

AI summary · check against sources

5.1 Agricultural Land Commission Partial Exclusion Application from Agricultural Land Reserve - Colwood Creek Park - Council Decision Points

parks environment12:27 Watch · Read

Staff said the decision was whether to send a partial exclusion application to the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC), not whether the site would remain a park. Exclusion could give the City more flexibility to carry out the park plan; if the ALC refuses, the City could instead seek approval for individual non-farm uses. Council also supported formally dedicating the remaining fee-simple parcel as parkland and reviewing the park management plan after the ALC decides. A councillor raised concerns about future changes to the park’s natural character and the possibility of a third-party covenant; staff agreed to investigate an in-trust option. A councillor recused themself after disclosing a post-hearing conversation with a resident, and did not take part in the vote.

Agreement

The ALC, not Council, will decide whether the land is removed from the Agricultural Land Reserve.
The park should remain parkland, and its management plan should be reviewed after the ALC decision.
Council wanted staff to investigate an in-trust safeguard as an additional option.

Disagreement

A councillor questioned whether park dedication alone would protect the park’s natural character from future amenity changes; staff said a future council could amend the management plan through a public process.
Staff said covenants generally are not used on land dedicated as municipal park, while councillors discussed whether a third-party arrangement could provide additional protection.

Carried 5 to 0R2026-204Item 5.146:37 Watch · Read

Add a request for staff to investigate whether an in-trust arrangement is an option for Colwood Creek Park.

Official wording: THAT the motion be amended to include the following: THAT Staff investigate an In-Trust option for Colwood Creek Park.

Moved by MAYOR KOBAYASHI, seconded by COUNCILLOR GROVE.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Not voting: Ian Ward (absent)

Carried 5 to 0R2026-205Item 5.146:37 Watch · Read

Send the application to remove part of Colwood Creek Park from the Agricultural Land Reserve to the provincial commission for consideration. Have staff survey the portion the City owns outright and formally dedicate it as parkland, then review and update the park management plan after the commission decides, involving the Parks and Environment Committee. Also have staff investigate an in-trust option for the park.

Official wording: THAT the partial exclusion application for Colwood Creek Park from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) for consideration; AND THAT Council direct staff to prepare a legal survey of the portion of Colwood Creek Park held in fee simple, and to proceed with the formal dedication of that parcel as parkland; AND THAT once a decision is made on the partial exclusion application from the ALC, that staff initiate a review and update of the Colwood Creek Park Management Plan, and include the Parks and Environment Committee. AND FURTHER THAT Staff investigate an In-Trust option for Colwood Creek Park.

Moved by COUNCILLOR DAY, seconded by COUNCILLOR JORDISON.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Not voting: Ian Ward (absent)

6.1 Website Considerations

governance1 public speaker47:26 Watch · Read

A public speaker urged Council to address long-running problems finding information on the City website. The motion called for a staff directory, an identified position responsible for website upkeep, searchable and prominent bylaws, a better development tracker, improved navigation and search, repaired links, and a tracker for Council decisions. Council changed the proposed 30-day report-back date to the August 24 meeting after staff said 30 days was not realistic with the meeting schedule. A proposed amendment to hold governance information to the same accuracy, timing and accountability standards as other critical municipal infrastructure was defeated. Staff said some work was already underway, including bylaw improvements and fixing broken links, and cautioned that connecting the meeting portal to the main website could involve costs.

Agreement

Residents and councillors should be able to find bylaws and other governance information more easily.
Staff should report on progress and costs, with the update scheduled for August 24, 2026.

Disagreement

A councillor proposed an additional standard requiring governance information to meet the accuracy, timing and accountability standards of other critical municipal infrastructure; Council defeated the amendment.
Councillors differed on whether the requested work and timelines were realistic and whether the website changes might bring additional costs.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-206Item 6.11:08:44 Watch · Read

Direct the City to treat its website as important public-service infrastructure. Restore a staff directory, assign a position to maintain the site, and improve access to bylaws, the organization chart, development applications, governance information, links, and search. Set up a tracker showing the status and expected reporting dates for Council decisions, report on its design and timeline within 60 days, and bring an implementation plan for the broader website improvements to the August 24, 2026 Council meeting.

Official wording: THAT Council direct the Chief Administrative Officer to treat the City of Colwood Website as core governance infrastructure by: Restore a staff directory including names, titles, direct line contacts and emails in a manner consistent with privacy and security best practices; Establish Governance Ownership by assigning the website responsibility to a named position, with defined maintenance standards, content review obligations, and accountability to Council; Improve Information Architecture by directing the position responsible to implement the following within 90 days: Consolidate Bylaws into a current, searchable, and prominently accessible location Relocate the Organizational Chart to the Governance section of the site Enhance the Development Tracker to include application status, site details, proponents and timelines Implement a task based navigation improvement to increase discoverability of governance content Correction of broken or outdated links, remediation of the search function deficiencies as identified to Council by members of the public including the March 12 submission from the Royal Bay Homeowners Association Establish a Council Decisions Tracker including which department is responding, status, and anticipated dates for reporting back to council on this initiative on design and timeline for the work within 60 days; and Report Back to council at the August 24, 2026, Regular Council meeting days with a report and an implementation plan, including timelines, for the full set of website improvements.

Moved by COUNCILLOR DAY, seconded by COUNCILLOR JORDISON.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Defeated 6 to 0R2026-207Item 6.11:07:55 Watch · Read

Amend the website motion to require governance information to be kept accurate and timely, with clear accountability, and to require the website to follow accessibility standards.

Official wording: THAT Council direct the Chief Administrative Officer to ensure governance information is maintained with the same standards of accuracy, timelines, and accountability expected of other critical municipal infrastructure supporting transparency, PP and information decision making by: AND THAT the Chief Administrative Office ensure that the website following accessibility standards.

Moved by COUNCILLOR JORDISON, seconded by COUNCILLOR DAY.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.2 Investigation of Speed-Control Measures for Kelly Road Playground Zone

transportation1:08:44 Watch · Read

Council directed staff to examine ways to slow traffic in the Kelly Road playground zone near Herm Williams Park. The review is to consider conventional measures such as raised crosswalks and speed humps, as well as an Actibump-style system that reacts to speeding vehicles. Staff said speed and traffic counts could be collected, the crossing was already under review by a transportation committee, and any proposed solutions would return to Council. The motion passed with one councillor opposed.

Agreement

Pedestrian safety near the park matters, and staff should consider ways to improve driver compliance.
The review should consider both conventional measures and newer speed-control technology.

Disagreement

One councillor opposed directing a further study, citing process, timing, possible budget impacts and existing transportation-planning work; the motion sponsor argued a broad review could help staff find the right solution.

Carried 5 to 1R2026-208Item 6.21:30:21 Watch · Read

Ask staff to assess and report on ways to reduce speeding and improve pedestrian safety in the Kelly Road playground zone, including conventional traffic-calming options and newer systems such as Actibump. The report should cover costs, effectiveness, legal and operational considerations, funding, and whether the location could be a pilot project. Staff should also examine whether changes to fencing, parking, and access could make it feasible to remove the playground zone because Kelly Road is an arterial road.

Official wording: WHEREAS Kelly Road contains a designated playground zone with significant pedestrian activity, including children and families accessing nearby recreational amenities; and WHEREAS concerns have been raised regarding vehicle speeds within and approaching the playground zone; and WHEREAS a range of conventional and emerging traffic-calming technologies exist that may improve compliance with posted speed limits and enhance pedestrian safety; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council direct staff to investigate and report back on the feasibility, effectiveness, regulatory considerations, and estimated capital and operating costs associated with implementing speed-control improvements within the Kelly Road playground zone. AND FURTHER THAT the review include, but not be limited to, consideration of: Speed ditches (inverted speed humps), consisting of concave roadway depressions that require vehicles to descend and ascend when crossing, thereby encouraging lower travel speeds; Actibump or active dynamic speed-control systems, whereby a radar-equipped roadway plate remains level for vehicles travelling at or below the posted speed limit but lowers for speeding vehicles, creating a noticeable vertical deflection; Raised crosswalks, raised intersections, speed humps, speed cushions, and other conventional traffic-calming measures; Enhanced signage, flashing beacons, speed feedback displays, and other speed-awareness technologies; and Any additional engineering measures staff deem appropriate to improve compliance with the posted speed limit and enhance pedestrian safety. AND THAT staff report on the suitability of the Kelly Road playground zone as a pilot project location for the testing and evaluation of innovative traffic-calming technologies not commonly used in British Columbia, including Actibump-style active dynamic speed-control systems and other emerging approaches designed to improve compliance with posted speed limits. AND THAT staff identify any legal, operational, accessibility, maintenance, emergency response, transit, cycling, insurance, procurement, or liability implications associated with the measures reviewed, including whether approvals from external agencies would be required and whether grant or partnership funding opportunities may be available to support implementation. AND THAT Council direct staff to investigate the feasibility of modifying and enhancing fencing and parking and access to facilitate removing the playground zone on Kelly Rd in keeping with its status as an arterial road. AND FURTHER THAT staff identify any legal, operational, accessibility, maintenance, emergency response, transit, cycling, insurance, procurement, or liability implications associated with the measures reviewed, including whether approvals from external agencies would be required and whether grant or partnership funding opportunities may be available to support implementation.

Moved by COUNCILLOR WARD, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Voted against: Kim Jordison

6.3 Hardscaping of Select Traffic Circles and Majority of Cul-de-Sac Islands to Reduce Maintenance Costs and Improve Streetscape Condition

parks environment1 public speaker1:39:04 Watch · Read

The motion asked staff to inventory City-maintained traffic circles and cul-de-sac islands, assess maintenance needs and costs, compare lifecycle costs for existing landscaping and lower-maintenance alternatives, and identify possible pilot sites. A representative of a local environmental organization relayed concerns that hardscaping could reduce shade, biodiversity and habitat, and suggested native, drought-tolerant plants and neighbourhood stewardship. Staff said a previous adopt-a-cul-de-sac effort drew interest but took too much administrative work to run informally; a newer volunteer program might allow it to be revisited. Council passed the study motion, with two councillors opposed.

Agreement

Council wanted an inventory and better information about maintenance, costs and possible alternatives before making future choices.
The motion does not require the City to hardscape all or any particular locations.

Disagreement

Some councillors argued that greenery, habitat and neighbourhood character should not be sacrificed for lower maintenance; others emphasized poor upkeep, staff safety on busy roads and the value of examining all options.
The public speaker opposed hardscaping as a default and favoured native planting and community stewardship.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-209Item 6.32:07:07 Watch · Read

Have staff assess whether some City-maintained traffic circles and cul-de-sac islands could be converted to hardscaping or other lower-maintenance designs. Report back with an inventory, current maintenance costs and problems, locations with poor landscaping, lifecycle cost comparisons, possible pilot sites, and design, drainage, and safety considerations.

Official wording: WHEREAS the City of Colwood maintains a number of traffic circles and cul-de-sac central islands that form part of the municipal road network and neighbourhood streetscape; AND WHEREAS many of these landscaped features require ongoing maintenance including mowing, irrigation, plant replacement, weed control, and seasonal upkeep, which contributes to recurring operational costs and staff time; AND WHEREAS in several locations, current landscaping conditions have deteriorated or are inconsistently maintained, negatively impacting the visual quality and overall appearance of neighbourhood streetscapes; AND WHEREAS hardscaped or low-maintenance design treatments, such as decorative rock, permeable paving, or durable architectural materials, may offer reduced lifecycle maintenance requirements, improved durability, and more consistent visual presentation over time; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council direct staff to investigate and report back on the feasibility, costs, and implications of converting existing traffic circles and cul-de-sac central islands within the City of Colwood to hardscaped or low-maintenance design standards where appropriate; AND FURTHER THAT the staff report include: An inventory of all City-maintained traffic circles and cul-de-sac central islands; An assessment of current maintenance requirements, associated costs, and known maintenance challenges; Identification of locations where existing landscaping is in poor condition or repeatedly requires remediation; A lifecycle cost comparison between current landscaping approaches and hardscaped or low-maintenance alternatives; Potential pilot locations where conversion could be tested; Consideration of design standards, drainage impacts, and safety requirements.

Moved by COUNCILLOR WARD, seconded by MAYOR KOBAYASHI.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.4 Adoption of Records Management Policy and Records Management Scanning Policy

governance2:07:33 Watch · Read

Council adopted two policies covering records management and scanning. Staff said the policies clarify how digital records can be managed and could reduce the burden of storing hundreds of boxes of paper files. Staff explained that retention periods vary by record type: bylaws and meeting agendas are kept permanently, while other records have set schedules.

Agreement

The policies provide a framework for managing records in both paper and digital form.
Meeting agendas and reports remain available through the City, subject to the applicable record-retention rules.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-210Item 6.42:09:52 Watch · Read

Adopt the two records management policies as presented.

Official wording: THAT Council adopt the Records Management Policy and Records Management Scanning Policy, as presented.

Moved by COUNCILLOR OLSEN, seconded by COUNCILLOR GROVE.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.5 Herm Williams Parks Management Plan Project Initiation

parks environment2:09:52 Watch · Read

Staff presented the project initiation report, which outlines the scope and staff responsibilities for preparing the Herm Williams Park Management Plan. Council received the report for information; there was no substantive discussion in the transcript.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-211Item 6.5

Routine: receive the report on starting the Herm Williams Park management plan project for information.

Official wording: THAT Council receive this report on the Herm Williams Park Management Plan project initiation, for information.

Moved by COUNCILLOR GROVE, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.6 Outlook Park Management Plan Project Initiation

parks environment2:10:46 Watch · Read

Council received the project initiation report for the Outlook Park Management Plan. A councillor highlighted the need to preserve the park’s natural character while improving access for people with mobility challenges, noting its views toward Mount Baker and opportunities to observe wildlife. The report was received for information.

Agreement

Accessibility and protection of the park’s natural setting should both be considered in the planning work.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-212Item 6.6

Routine: receive the report on starting the Outlook Park management plan project for information.

Official wording: THAT Council receive the report on the Outlook Park Management Plan project initiation, for information.

Moved by COUNCILLOR GROVE, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.7 2025 Statement of Financial Information

budget finance2:12:29 Watch · Read

Council approved the City’s 2025 Statement of Financial Information and authorized the Mayor and finance officers to sign it. Staff said approval was required before the end of June. A councillor also asked about the schedule for the 2027 budget process; the chair directed that a related motion be brought forward separately, and the issue appears later as item 7.6.

Agreement

The 2025 financial statement needed approval before the statutory month-end deadline.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-213Item 6.72:14:49 Watch · Read

Approve the City's 2025 financial information statement and authorize the Mayor and two finance officials to sign its approval.

Official wording: THAT the 2025 Statement of Financial Information be approved; AND THAT the Mayor, the Director of Finance and the Manager of Finance be authorized to sign the approval of the 2025 Statement of Financial Information.

Moved by COUNCILLOR DAY, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

6.8 Annual Development Cost Charge Report

budget finance2:15:36 Watch · Read

Council received the annual Development Cost Charge (DCC) report for information. Staff explained that a higher figure shown for a project reflected an early estimate, not an approved budget increase; tendering was expected in August, and a grant decision was expected in July. Staff said road DCC work was scheduled for 2027 and sewer DCC work was likely in 2028.

Agreement

The report was received for information, and the project figure may change after tendering and the grant decision.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-214Item 6.8

Routine: receive the 2025 development cost charges report for information.

Official wording: THAT the 2025 Annual Development Cost Charges Report be received for information purposes.

Moved by COUNCILLOR GROVE, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

7.1 Sewer Local Area Service Enlargement Amendment Bylaws - First, Second and Third Reading

utilities infrastructure2:20:31 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to two sewer local area service enlargement bylaws for 3391 Fulton Road, covering the Colwood Main Sewer and Colwood West Sewer service areas. The readings advance the proposed enlargement through the bylaw process.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-215Item 7.12:20:31 Watch · Read

Give the first three readings to the sewer service changes needed to include 3391 Fulton Road in the applicable local sewer service areas.

Official wording: THAT the following sewer local area service enlargement amendment bylaws be given first, second and third reading:  "Colwood Main Sewer Local Area Service Establishment and Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 598, 2001, Amendment No. 184 (LAS Enlargement – 3391 Fulton Road), Bylaw No. 2114, 2026"  “Colwood West Sewer Local Area Service Establishment and Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 625, 2001, Amendment No. 99 (LAS Enlargement – 3391 Fulton Road), Bylaw No. 2116, 2026”

Moved by COUNCILLOR GROVE, seconded by COUNCILLOR WARD.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

7.2 Colwood Land Use Bylaw No. 151, 1989, Amendment No. 220 (CD43 – 3145 Metchosin Rd), Bylaw No. 2054, 2025 - Adoption

zoning development2:21:19 Watch · Read

Instead of adopting the bylaw for 3145 Metchosin Road, Council referred it back to staff. Councillors questioned whether the 25-metre road dedication secured with the application would leave enough room for a possible future widening of Metchosin Road to 30 metres, and also raised the bylaw’s allowance of 11 metres or three storeys. Staff said the City could not require additional dedication without a settled corridor need and that the registered development-agreement wording matched what Council had previously approved. A councillor proposed changing the height wording, but Council voted to refer the item back so staff could speak with the applicant and report further.

Agreement

Council wanted more clarity before a final decision on the bylaw.
Staff should discuss the concerns with the applicant and return with further information.

Disagreement

Some councillors favoured a firm limit requiring both the stated height and storey count; others objected to changing the rules at the adoption stage after the applicant had proceeded under the existing wording.
Councillors differed on whether the City should secure more Metchosin Road width now or wait until future transportation needs are clearer.

ReferredR2026-217Item 7.22:41:15 Watch · Read

Send the proposed land-use bylaw for 3145 Metchosin Road back to staff for further work.

Official wording: THAT Council refer "Colwood Land Use Bylaw No. 151, 1989, Amendment No. 220 (CD43 – 3145 Metchosin Rd), Bylaw No. 2054, 2025" back to staff.

Moved by COUNCILLOR DAY, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

7.3 Colwood Land Use Bylaw No. 151, 1989, Amendment No. 231 (HAH1-3415 Fulton Road), Bylaw No. 2105, 2026 - Adoption

zoning development2:41:42 Watch · Read

Council adopted the land-use bylaw for 3415 Fulton Road. The discussion revisited whether the zone should set building height as both a maximum number of storeys and a maximum height in metres. Staff said the hillside site’s topography explains the difference between the two limits and that Council would later review the form-and-character development permit. Several councillors argued that changing the wording at adoption would unfairly move the goalposts for the applicant; two councillors voted against adoption.

Agreement

Councillors recognized that height rules should be clearer in future applications.
Council will have a further chance to review the building’s form and character through the development permit.

Disagreement

Some councillors wanted both the storey limit and metre limit to apply together; others said changing the bylaw at the final stage would be unfair to the applicant.

Carried 5 to 1R2026-218Item 7.32:52:40 Watch · Read

Adopt the land-use bylaw amendment for 3415 Fulton Road.

Official wording: THAT "Colwood Land Use Bylaw No. 151, 1989, Amendment No. 231 (HAH1-3415 Fulton Road), Bylaw No. 2105, 2026" be adopted.

Moved by COUNCILLOR WARD, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Voted against: Kim Jordison

7.4 Off-Street Parking Regulations Bylaw No 1909-3 (SSMUH) - Adoption

transportation2:52:40 Watch · Read

Council adopted the off-street parking bylaw related to small-scale, multi-unit housing (SSMUH). Staff noted that the City had told the province further amendments would be coming at the next meeting, following Council’s earlier direction, and that the broader SSMUH bylaw work would return. Two councillors opposed adoption.

Carried 5 to 1R2026-219Item 7.42:53:25 Watch · Read

Adopt the off-street parking regulations for small-scale, multi-unit housing.

Official wording: THAT "Off-Street Parking Regulations Bylaw No 1909-3 (SSMUH)" be adopted.

Moved by COUNCILLOR OLSEN, seconded by COUNCILLOR WARD.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Voted against: Kim Jordison

7.5 Public Notice Bylaw No. 2117, 2026 - Adoption

governance2:53:25 Watch · Read

Council adopted the Public Notice Bylaw. The transcript records no substantive discussion of the bylaw.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-220Item 7.52:54:12 Watch · Read

Adopt the City's public notice bylaw.

Official wording: THAT the "Public Notice Bylaw No. 2117, 2026" be adopted.

Moved by COUNCILLOR GROVE, seconded by COUNCILLOR OLSEN.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

7.6 Notice of Motion - Service Review and Budget 2027

budget finance2:54:12 Watch · Read

This item was not listed in the published agenda but came forward as a notice of motion. It directs staff to return to the August 24, 2026 Council meeting with a proposal for the 2027 service review and budget-development framework. The transcript does not capture a clear vote or declaration of the result.

Carried 6 to 0R2026-221Item 7.6

Ask staff to bring a proposed framework for the 2027 service review and budget process to the August 24, 2026 Council meeting.

Official wording: THAT Council direct staff to return to the August 24, 2026 Regular Council meeting with a proposal for the 2027 service review and budget development framework process.

Moved by COUNCILLOR JORDISON, seconded by COUNCILLOR DAY.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

Other decisions

Official · from the minutes

Carried 6 to 0R2026-202Item 2

Routine: adopt the agenda for this meeting as presented.

Official wording: THAT the Agenda of the Special Council meeting of June 29, 2026 be adopted as presented.

Moved by COUNCILLOR OLSEN, seconded by COUNCILLOR JORDISON.

Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance