City Government Watcher
All Colwood meetings

Council and Public Hearing - 22 Jun 2026

City of Colwood · Mon, Jun 22, 2026 18:30 · 3300 Wishart Road Council Chambers Colwood BC

AgendaMinutesVideoTranscript
Watch the meetingOfficial minutesOfficial agenda

Summary

AI summary · check against sources

Council approved a set of changes to guide future updates to its Procedure Bylaw, received the draft 2025 annual report and authorized a gaming-grant support letter. The most contested issue was whether to ask the Agricultural Land Commission to remove 8.16 hectares of Colwood Creek Park from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), so the City could add park features such as washrooms, benches and fencing; many hearing speakers feared added costs, safety problems and weaker protection against future development. Council discussed sending the application forward and adding a restrictive covenant to protect park use, but the meeting was disrupted and adjourned before that proposal was decided. The hearing record included five written submissions—three opposed and two in favour—and the ALR application’s next step remains unresolved in this meeting.

Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.

What was discussed

AI summary · check against sources

4.1 Resolution Released from the June 22, 2026 Special In Camera Meeting

governance25:10 Watch · Read

Council released a resolution approving ratification of a tentative collective agreement between the City of Colwood and CUPE 374. The agreement covers January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027.

Agreement
  • The released resolution records approval of the tentative agreement.

6.1 Partial Exclusion Application of Colwood Creek Park from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR)

parks environment22 public speakers26:44 Watch · Read

At the public hearing, staff described a city application to remove about 8.16 hectares of the park from the ALR while leaving 1.76 hectares in it. Staff said the existing ALR designation limits new park infrastructure, including features in the park management plan, and reported an assessment finding low to very low agricultural potential because of stoniness, poor drainage and periodic flooding. Staff said the application would not itself change the park’s Official Community Plan designation or zoning, and recommended surveying and formally dedicating the remaining fee-simple parcel as parkland. Speakers raised concerns about washroom vandalism, security, costs, impacts on nearby homes and the risk of future development; others said the land was not suitable for farming and that park improvements were needed. Many speakers called for the creek and pond to be fenced to protect wildlife, and for simple amenities such as benches and tables. The hearing closed without a Council decision.

Agreement
  • Several speakers supported protecting the creek and pond from dogs with fencing.
  • Some speakers wanted modest park amenities, including benches, tables or a washroom, even as they questioned the broader proposal.
  • Staff said the application concerns removal of the ALR designation, not a change to the park’s current planning designation or zoning.
Disagreement
  • Many speakers opposed removing most of the park from the ALR, citing fears of future development, safety concerns and maintenance costs; others argued that the land was not suitable for agriculture and that the ALR designation blocked needed park improvements.
  • Speakers differed on whether washrooms were necessary and whether they could be kept secure and well maintained.

8.1 Council Procedure Bylaw

governance1:38:28 Watch · Read

Council approved a package of recommendations for modernizing its procedure rules. The changes direct staff to review and simplify the bylaw, provide a redlined draft at least two weeks before Council considers it, distribute full Council and committee agendas by Wednesday before meetings, and place unanimous committee recommendations on Council’s consent agenda. They also set speaking limits, provide for 30 minutes of public participation at the start of meetings, require public submissions to be published in searchable form with personal information removed, limit submissions to one per person per meeting, and establish notice-of-motion and workshop rules.

Agreement
  • The recommendations in the consent agenda were carried without any opposition being declared.
Carried 6 to 0R2026-188Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Ask staff to review and propose updates to the rules for Council and committee meetings, aiming to make them clearer, more accessible, and up to date. Staff must give Council a version showing the proposed changes at least two weeks before Council considers the bylaw.

Official wording: THAT Council direct staff to review the City’s Procedure Bylaw and bring forward proposed amendments to simplify and modernize its framework, with the goal of improving clarity, accessibility, and alignment with current legislative requirements and best practices. THAT Staff provide a red lined version of the Draft Procedure Bylaw a minimum of two (2) weeks prior to Council considering the bylaw.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-189Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Set a deadline for distributing complete Council, Committee of the Whole, and Select or Standing Committee agenda packages: by the end of the Wednesday before each meeting.

Official wording: THAT Complete Council and Committee of the Whole agenda packages be distributed by end of day Wednesday prior to the meeting date; AND THAT Complete Select/Standing Committee agenda packages be distributed by the end of the day Wednesday prior to the meeting date.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-190Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Put recommendations that committees approve unanimously on Council’s consent agenda, where they can be handled together.

Official wording: THAT recommendations passed unanimously from Committee of the Whole, Standing or Select committees be scheduled under the consent agenda for Council.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-191Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Set speaking rules for Council motions: members may speak twice for up to five minutes each, and may also ask questions or comment for up to five minutes before a motion. The member who first brought forward a substantive motion may have a final chance to respond to objections before the vote, even if they have used their speaking time.

Official wording: THAT each member may speak twice for a maximum of five (5) minutes to a motion; AND THAT questions or comments are allowed prior to a motion to a maximum five (5) minutes per member; AND FURTHER THAT the member who initially introduced a substantive main motion is permitted a final "reply to the debate" to respond to objections before the final vote is called, even if they have already exhausted their initial speaking time.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-192Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Provide 30 minutes for public participation at the start of a meeting, with the option to extend it. Give each speaker three minutes, with up to two extra minutes if the Chair agrees, and offer public participation at the start of each agenda item.

Official wording: THAT thirty (30) minutes be allotted for Public Participation at the beginning of the meeting, which may be extended by the Chair or by majority vote of members present; AND THAT each participant be allotted three (3) minutes with an additional two (2) minutes with consent from the chair; AND THAT public participation be offered at the beginning of each agenda item.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-193Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Accept public submissions in writing, send them to Council when received, and publish them in a searchable format with the relevant meeting materials. Personal information would be removed before publication.

Official wording: THAT written submissions from the public be accepted, circulated when received to Council and be published under public input in a searchable format on the website and linked to the Council or Committee meeting they were received for with personal information redacted.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-194Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Limit each person to one written submission per meeting.

Official wording: THAT written submissions be limited to one per person per meeting.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-195Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Add a period at the end of regular Council meetings for members to give notice of motions they want considered at the next meeting, with an option for emergency motions. Also bring back a long-term agenda, or a similar tool, to show upcoming Council business, and clarify that giving notice does not prevent a member from making a motion on an item already on the agenda.

Official wording: THAT a notice of motion period be scheduled at the end of the Regular Council meetings for motions to be heard at the next Regular Council meeting incorporating an emergency motion option; AND THAT a long-term agenda be re-established or commensurate approach to enhance transparency for forthcoming Council business. AND FURTHER THAT a note be added that a notice of motion does not preclude a member from making a motion relevant to an agenda item on the agenda.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-196Item 8.11:40:44 Watch · Read

Include workshop rules in the Procedure Bylaw: workshops would not make decisions or require a quorum, and there would be no direction about including or excluding notes, tables, or input. The place, time, and topic should be posted; if a workshop is closed to the public, its date, time, and general topic should still be posted.

Official wording: THAT workshops be included in the Procedure Bylaw including these guidelines:  No decision  No quorum  No direction to include or exclude notes, tables or input:  Yes, schedule of place, time, topic should be posted  Yes, if workshop is held without public the date, time and general topic should be posted so that we ensure that the business of governing is following the law and transparency is protected.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

8.2 Draft 2025 Annual Report

budget finance1:38:28 Watch · Read

Council received the draft annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. The item was part of the consent agenda; the transcript contains no separate discussion of its contents.

Agreement
  • Council received the draft report through the consent agenda.
Carried 6 to 0R2026-197Item 8.21:40:44 Watch · Read

Routine: receive the draft annual report for the year ending December 31, 2025.

Official wording: THAT Council receive the Draft Annual Report for Fiscal Year ending December 31, 2025.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

8.3 Relmagine – Letter of Support – 2027 Community Gaming Grant Application

community services1:38:28 Watch · Read

Council authorized the Mayor to provide Relmagine West Shore with a letter of support for its 2027 Community Gaming Grant application. The item was carried on the consent agenda without separate discussion in the transcript.

Agreement
  • Council authorized the support letter through the consent agenda.
Carried 6 to 0R2026-198Item 8.31:40:44 Watch · Read

Authorize the Mayor to write a letter supporting Relmagine West Shore’s application for a 2027 Community Gaming Grant.

Official wording: THAT the Mayor be authorized to provide a letter of support to Relmagine West Shore for their 2027 Gaming Grant Application.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Grove.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance

9.1 Partial Exclusion Application of Colwood Creek Park from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) (Public Hearing held June 22, 2026)

parks environment1:41:35 Watch · Read

Council debated whether to forward the partial exclusion application to the Agricultural Land Commission and direct staff to survey and formally dedicate the fee-simple parcel as parkland. Councillors and staff discussed the limits imposed by the ALR, the legal protections for dedicated parkland, and residents’ concerns about future development. A councillor proposed adding staff work on a restrictive covenant to protect park uses and changing a proposed referral to the Parks and Recreation Committee so the matter would return directly to Council. The discussion was interrupted before the proposed motion and amendment were put to a vote. The meeting was adjourned, so the transcript shows no decision on the application.

Agreement
  • Council members expressed support for preserving Colwood Creek Park as green space and discussed ways to protect the creek and pond.
  • Staff explained that changing the park’s use would involve substantial public processes and that formally dedicating the fee-simple parcel would add protection.
Disagreement
  • Some councillors supported forwarding the application so park improvements could proceed; the hearing speakers had largely urged Council to retain the ALR designation because of concerns about future development, safety and costs.
  • Councillors differed on whether to refer the matter to the Parks and Recreation Committee after the Agricultural Land Commission’s response or bring it directly back to Council, and whether staff should explore a restrictive covenant.

Other decisions

Official · from the minutes
Carried 6 to 0R2026-186Item 2

Routine: adopt the agenda for the June 22 Council meeting and Public Hearing as presented.

Official wording: THAT the Agenda of the Regular Council meeting and Public Hearing of June 22, 2026 be adopted as presented.
Moved by Councillor Olsen, seconded by Councillor Jordison.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-187Item 5

Routine: approve the June 8 Council minutes and receive the April 20 Transportation and Infrastructure Committee minutes for information.

Official wording: THAT the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held June 8, 2026 be adopted as presented, AND THAT the minutes of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting held April 20, 2026 be received for information.
Moved by Councillor Grove, seconded by Councillor Olsen.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance
Carried 6 to 0R2026-201Item 10

Routine: adjourn the meeting at 8:27 pm.

Official wording: THAT the meeting adjourn at 8:27 pm.
Moved by Councillor Day, seconded by Councillor Ward.
Voted for: Cynthia Day, David Grove, Doug Kobayashi, Ian Ward, Kim Jordison, Misty Olsen inferred from attendance