City Government Watcher
All Sooke meetings

Regular Council - 27 Jul 2026

District of Sooke · Mon, Jul 27, 2026 18:00 · Council Chamber

AgendaMinutesVideoTranscript
Watch the meetingOfficial minutesOfficial agenda

Summary

AI summary · check against sources

Council advanced Sooke’s short-term rental rule changes to a third reading, despite sharp disagreement over restricting bed-and-breakfast and short-term rental businesses on the same property. It approved a duplex near the shore at 6507 Water Street, but refused to waive the applicant’s road-frontage costs; a nearby resident had raised concerns about slope stability, flooding and archaeological finds. Public comments also put the proposed Through Road Connector under pressure, with speakers split between wanting the road built and fearing the proposed design would cost about $50 million and damage Art Morris Park. Council awarded the municipal hall roof contract for $234,754, approved $1,000 for the music and arts festival, and passed two zoning bylaws, while the transcript’s account of the Catalyst tax-exemption decision does not match the official motions list.

Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.

What was discussed

AI summary · check against sources

3.1 Approval of the Agenda

governance6:28 Watch · Read

Council adopted the agenda as presented.

Carried 5 to 02026-289Item 3.16:28 Watch · Read

Routine: approve the agenda for this meeting as presented.

Official wording: THAT the agenda for the July 27, 2026 Regular Meeting of Council be adopted as presented.

4.1 Short-Term Rental Accommodation Modernization: Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 947 (600-120), 2026

housing2 public speakers7:16 Watch · Read

Staff described proposed zoning rules intended to clarify how short-term rentals work and align them with provincial rules. A host could rent up to two dwelling units, with at least one being the host’s principal residence; the host would not have to stay on site, and the maximum consecutive stay would rise from 30 to 90 days. The bylaw would also bar a bed and breakfast and a short-term rental from operating at the same time on one property. Staff said this would prevent multiple commercial accommodation uses from accumulating on residential parcels. Two members of the public spoke: a local operator said the change could threaten a long-running business that combines both uses, and another speaker questioned the fairness of the rules and asked council to pause for more research.

Agreement
  • Staff said the amendments would clarify definitions and existing rules, and would not add short-term rental permissions in zones where vacation accommodation is not already allowed.
  • Staff said the existing combined bed-and-breakfast and short-term rental operation would be legally non-conforming if the bylaw passed, meaning it could continue but could not be expanded.
Disagreement
  • The operator affected by the ban on combining uses asked council not to adopt the bylaw as drafted, saying it could damage the household’s income.
  • Another speaker argued the proposal needed more research and questioned whether its treatment of different properties was fair.

5.1 Adoption of Minutes

governance

The official motions list records adoption of the July 13 regular meeting minutes and the July 20 Committee of the Whole and special meeting minutes. This decision is not captured in the transcript.

Carried 5 to 02026-290Item 5.1

Routine: adopt the minutes of the July 13 Regular meeting and the July 20 Committee of the Whole and Special meetings.

Official wording: THAT the following Council meeting minutes be adopted as presented:  July 13, 2026 - Regular  July 20, 2026 - Committee of the Whole  July 20, 2026 - Special

7 PUBLIC QUESTION AND COMMENT PERIOD

governance13 public speakers25:18 Watch · Read

Thirteen members of the public spoke. Several objected to a proposed $50 million Through Road Connector design they said could reduce space at Art Morris Park, and advocated for a narrower or less costly road that would preserve the fields. Others supported building a connector but asked council to protect the park; one speaker proposed an alternative design estimated at $15 million, including a two-lane road, centre turn lane, sidewalk and bike lane within a 20-metre right-of-way. A resident raised slope, flood, shoreline and archaeological concerns about the 6507 Water Street proposal; the applicant asked council to reconsider the $107,000 frontage cost. Two speakers opposed a permissive tax exemption for Catalyst, questioning its effect on homeowners and whether the medical centre depended on it. A speaker also urged council to seek alternatives to rising E-Comm 911 costs, and the Fred Mill Park Society president defended its rental-rate increases as necessary to maintain the facility.

Agreement
  • Speakers on the Through Road Connector generally agreed that Sooke needs another connection; they differed on the road’s scale, cost and impact on recreation.
  • Speakers raised the need to consider the costs and effects of the Catalyst tax exemption, though they did not agree on whether it should be granted.
Disagreement
  • Several speakers opposed the 25-metre road corridor and its impact on Art Morris Park; a speaker supported the connector but also urged a narrower design that protects the park.
  • The applicant for 6507 Water Street sought relief from the frontage charge, while another speaker raised safety and environmental concerns about the proposed development.
  • Two speakers opposed the Catalyst tax exemption, arguing it was unnecessary or would add pressure to homeowners; council later approved the bylaw, though the transcript does not fully align with the official motions list.

8.1 Consent Agenda

governance53:48 Watch · Read

Council dealt with the consent agenda after members pulled some correspondence for separate handling. The official motions list records adoption by consent of correspondence, the Chief Administrative Officer’s report and the E-Comm 911 update.

Carried 5 to 02026-291Item 8.156:20 Watch · Read

Routine: approve the correspondence, the CAO's report, and the E-Comm 911 update through the consent agenda.

Official wording: THAT the following items on the Consent Agenda be adopted by consent: 8.2 Correspondence 8.3 Report of the Chief Administrative Officer 8.4 E-Comm 911 Updates

8.2 Correspondence

governance53:48 Watch · Read

Several correspondence items were pulled from the consent agenda, including letters about the Through Road Connector, the short-term rental bylaw and an engineering safety matter. The official motions list records receipt of the specified correspondence for information.

Carried 5 to 02026-292Item 8.256:20 Watch · Read

Set aside the listed letters and petition so Council can discuss them at a future regular meeting, and receive the other correspondence from July 8 to 22 for information.

Official wording: THAT the correspondence 10.J Throup Connector, Art Morris Park Ball Field (David Saunders), 19.F Re-Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 947 - Mike and Kathy Hicks , 22.I Engineering Safety Matter Petition - Tamara Parks, 8.H Ella Beach Behaviours - Fred Brown, 7.G Agenda 10.6 Throup Connector (Johnny Wright) and 18. E Follow up-Coordination Public Records and Municipal Legal Defence (Phil Perras) be pulled for discussion at a future Regular Council meeting, and that the remaining correspondence from July 8 through July 22, 2026, be received for information.

8.3 Report of the Chief Administrative Officer

transportation22:48 Watch · Read

In an update on the Phillips Road connector project, the Chief Administrative Officer said the tender had closed and work was expected to become more visible around September, after a slight delay. The province was expected to provide more information about timing and any road closures; staff said it had discussed school access and advance communication with the school district. Public comments during the question period focused on a different proposed connector, the Through Road Connector, with residents debating its cost, right-of-way and effect on Art Morris Park. Council received the report for information; the transcript shows no decision on either road design.

Agreement
  • Council and speakers recognised the importance of communicating roadwork impacts and keeping school crossings safe.
  • Through Road Connector speakers broadly supported the need for a connection, while several asked that recreation space be protected.
Disagreement
  • Several members of the public opposed a 25-metre corridor and an estimated $50 million design for the Through Road Connector; a speaker supported the connector but proposed a smaller, less costly alternative.
Carried 5 to 02026-293Item 8.356:20 Watch · Read

Routine: receive the Chief Administrative Officer's report for information.

Official wording: THAT Council receive the Report of the Chief Administrative Officer for information.

8.4 E-Comm 911 Update

public safety53:48 Watch · Read

Council received the E-Comm 911 update for information and directed staff to draft a letter to the local Member of Parliament and Member of the Legislative Assembly about the cost impact on Sooke. A member of the public urged council to examine alternatives and push back against projected cost increases.

Agreement
  • The public speaker said the rising costs were a concern shared by council and the community.
Carried 5 to 02026-294Item 8.456:20 Watch · Read

Routine: the Committee of the Whole recommended that Council receive the E-Comm 911 report for information.

Official wording: THAT the Committee of the Whole recommend that Council receive this report for information.

9.1 Roof Replacement for Sooke Municipal Hall

budget finance56:20 Watch · Read

Council considered four bids for the municipal hall roof and siding work; only Regal Roofing Ltd.’s bid met the requirements. Staff recommended awarding the contract for $234,754, excluding goods and services tax. Councillors questioned the cost and raised concerns that local contractors had not been adequately alerted to the tender. Staff said public purchasing rules required an open bid for construction contracts above $100,000 and local preference could create legal risks. The motion passed, with three votes in favour and two against.

Agreement
  • Council agreed the hall needed a new roof and that the tender had to follow public procurement rules.
Disagreement
  • Councillor Haldane said he would vote against the award, arguing local contractors should have had a better chance to bid.
  • Councillor St-Pierre supported the award despite concerns about the limits on local preference; another councillor also questioned the loss of local work.
Carried 3 to 22026-295Item 9.11:06:10 Watch · Read

Hire Regal Roofing Ltd. to replace the municipal hall roof for $234,754 plus GST.

Official wording: That Council award the Roof Replacement for Sooke Municipal Hall project contract to Regal Roofing Ltd. in the amount of $234,754, excluding GST.
Voted against: Herb Haldane, Kevin Pearson
Not voting: Maja Tait (absent), Megan McMath (absent)

9.2 Development Permit with Variances (PLN01930); Flood Plain Exemption (PLN02032)

zoning development1 public speaker1:06:59 Watch · Read

Council approved permits and a floodplain setback exemption for a duplex and deck at 6507 Water Street. The proposal reduces the sea setback from 15 metres to 3.09 metres for the dwelling and 1.2 metres for the deck. Approval is subject to a registered covenant securing a 3.62-metre flood construction elevation and compliance with geotechnical recommendations and hazard acknowledgements. Council first rescinded an earlier approval made before required notice was complete. It then denied the request to waive frontage improvements, which the applicant said would cost about $107,000. Staff said the applicant could proceed with the other approvals but would remain responsible for the frontage requirement. One nearby resident had spoken during public comment about slope stability, flood and shoreline risks, and possible archaeological finds; the applicant spoke during council’s discussion about the cost and delay.

Agreement
  • Council approved the development permit, sea-setback variance and floodplain exemption, subject to the stated covenant and permit conditions.
  • Staff explained that the applicable flood construction level was 3.62 metres and that archaeological chance-find procedures would apply.
Disagreement
  • A nearby resident argued the slope, flood, shoreline and archaeological risks required further study before approval.
  • Councillor Bateman opposed denying the frontage variance, saying the narrow road might need a different cross-section; the chair and Councillor St-Pierre supported denying it, citing the wider effects of changing the district’s frontage rules.
  • The applicant said the $107,000 frontage cost came as a surprise and asked council to reconsider it, but was reluctant to accept further delay.
Carried 4 to 02026-296Item 9.21:29:37 Watch · Read

Withdraw Council's earlier approval of this development application because the required variance-notice process had not been completed.

Official wording: THAT the approval of item 8.6 as part of Resolution 2026-259 (Development Permit with Variances PLN01930); Flood Plain Exemption (PLN 02032) be rescinded.
Carried 4 to 02026-297Item 9.21:32:01 Watch · Read

Approve a duplex and deck at 6507 Water Street, allow them to be closer to the shoreline than the usual setback, and grant a floodplain setback exemption. The exemption is conditional on registering a covenant that secures the required flood construction level, geotechnical recommendations, and flood-hazard protections.

Official wording: THAT Council authorize issuance of Development Permit PLN01930 for 6507 Water Street, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Section 14, Sooke Land District, Plan EPP88370, to permit the construction of a duplex dwelling and deck in accordance with the terms and conditions of draft Development Permit PLN01930 (Attachment 1); THAT Council authorize issuance of Development Variance Permit PLN01930 (Attachment 1) to vary Section 3.21 of Zoning Bylaw No. 600, 2013, by reducing the required setback from the Present Natural Boundary of the Sea from 15.0 m to 3.09 m for the principal dwelling and 1.2 m for the deck; THAT Council grant an exemption under section 524 of the Local Government Act and section 11(b) of Flood Plain Regulation Bylaw No. 773, 2020, to permit the proposed dwelling to be located 3.09 m from the present natural boundary of the sea, subject to registration of a section 219 covenant under the Land Title Act to secure compliance with the applicable Flood Construction Level of 3.62 m geodetic elevation, the recommendations of the Ryzuk Geotechnical Assessment dated May 6, 2026, as amended, and related flood hazard acknowledgement, release, indemnity, and save harmless provisions, to the satisfaction of the District; THAT the floodplain setback exemption does not take effect until the required Section 219 covenant has been registered on title to the satisfaction of the District;
Carried 4 to 02026-298Item 9.21:42:32 Watch · Read

Require the developer to meet the required road-frontage improvements rather than granting an exemption from them.

Official wording: AND THAT Council deny the requested variance to exempt the proposed development from the frontage improvement requirements under Section 3.2 of Subdivision and Development Standards Bylaw No. 925, 2025;

9.3 Park Use Permit - Commercial Use

parks environment1:47:12 Watch · Read

Council authorized Sooke Food CHI Society to hold a Harvest Festival and Market at Sunriver Community Garden and Orchard, 2380 Phillips Road, on September 20, 2026. It also waived the society’s administrative fee, commercial-use permit fee and deposit, as it had done in previous years.

Agreement
  • Council approved the permit and fee waivers unanimously.
Carried 5 to 02026-299Item 9.31:49:38 Watch · Read

Allow Sooke Food CHI Society to hold its Harvest Festival and Market at the Sunriver Community Garden and Orchard on September 20, 2026, and waive the event's administrative fee, permit fee, and deposit.

Official wording: THAT Council authorize a Commercial Parks Use Permit to Sooke Food CHI Society for a Harvest Festival and Market at the Sunriver Community Garden and Orchard, 2380 Phillips Road, in accordance with section 6.0 of the Community Park Regulation Bylaw No. 101 and subject to the conditions outlined in the permit (Attachment 1). THAT Council exempt Sooke Food CHI Society from administrative fee, commercial use permit fee, and deposit for the use of Sunriver Community Garden and Orchard for the September 20, 2026, in accordance with Section 8 of the Community Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 101.

9.4 Request for Sponsorship: Sooke Music and Arts Festival 2026

community services1:49:38 Watch · Read

Council approved a $1,000 sponsorship for the 2026 Sooke Music and Arts Festival. Councillors described community-wide festivals as a good use of sponsorship funds. Staff said a regional tourism committee may later consider how event grants are handled; the current sponsorship budget had $1,362 remaining.

Agreement
  • Councillors supported the $1,000 request, noting the festival is a public event with broad community value.
Carried 5 to 02026-300Item 9.41:53:46 Watch · Read

Give the Sooke Music and Arts Festival $1,000 in sponsorship for its 2026 event.

Official wording: That Council approve the sponsorship request from Sooke Music and Arts Festival for their 2026 event in the amount of $1,000.

9.5 Update on Wastewater Bylaw Development

utilities infrastructure1:53:46 Watch · Read

Staff said work on a replacement wastewater bylaw was taking longer than expected because they and a consultant were still trying to build a fair funding model. The model may shift away from a parcel tax and rely entirely on user fees; staff expected to return with a proposal in September. The current $625 parcel tax is tied to a bylaw that ends when the associated debt is paid, so a new bylaw is needed.

Agreement
  • Council accepted the update and understood staff would bring back a funding proposal for further consideration.
Disagreement
  • No decision was made on whether wastewater costs should be recovered through a parcel tax, user fees or a combination.
Carried 5 to 02026-301Item 9.52:00:12 Watch · Read

Routine: receive the wastewater bylaw update for information.

Official wording: THAT Council receive this report for information

10.1 Short-Term Rental Accommodation Modernization: Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 947 (600-120), 2026

housing2:00:12 Watch · Read

Council gave the short-term rental bylaw third reading, the last vote before adoption. Councillors discussed the ban on operating a bed and breakfast and short-term rental on the same property. Staff said it was intended to prevent accommodation uses from becoming the main commercial use of residential properties, while the bylaw also clarifies rules and aligns much of the framework with provincial legislation. Staff confirmed the one identified existing combined operation would be legally non-conforming and could continue if it maintained its business licence. The vote passed, with two councillors opposed.

Agreement
  • Councillors recognised that the bylaw clarifies currently uncertain short-term rental rules and allows the identified existing combined operation to continue as non-conforming.
Disagreement
  • One councillor argued the restriction would remove useful property options without evidence of a problem and said they would vote against it.
  • Other councillors supported the rule as a way to limit commercial activity in residential areas and protect neighbours from noise, parking and other effects.
Carried 3 to 22026-302Item 10.12:22:15 Watch · Read

Give the proposed short-term rental rule changes a third reading, advancing the bylaw that updates how Sooke regulates short-term rentals.

Official wording: THAT Council give Third Reading to Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 947 (600-120), 2026, to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 600 to modernize Sooke’s regulation of Short-Term Rental Accommodations.
Voted against: Herb Haldane, Kevin Pearson
Not voting: Maja Tait (absent), Megan McMath (absent)

10.2 Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 950 (600-121), 2026 – RU2 Housekeeping Amendment

zoning development2:22:15 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to a change clarifying housing and accessory-suite rules in the rural RU2 zone. Staff said the amendment fixes ambiguity created by 2025 small-scale, multi-unit housing changes, which could otherwise be read to allow each permitted single-family dwelling to have both a secondary suite and a detached suite.

Agreement
  • A councillor described the amendment as a practical correction to unintended ambiguity.
Disagreement
  • The vote was 3–2; Councillor Haldane voted against. The transcript does not state the other opposing councillor’s identity.
Carried 3 to 22026-303Item 10.22:24:36 Watch · Read

Give three readings to zoning changes that clarify how many homes and accessory suites are allowed in the RU2 rural zone.

Official wording: THAT Council give first, second, and third reading to Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 950 (600-121), 2026, to amend Schedule 102 – Rural (RU2) of Zoning Bylaw No. 600 to clarify residential density permissions and accessory suite regulations in the RU2 zone.
Voted against: Herb Haldane, Kevin Pearson
Not voting: Maja Tait (absent), Megan McMath (absent)

10.3 Permissive Tax Exemption Application from Catalyst

budget finance2 public speakers2:24:36 Watch · Read

Council discussed a permissive tax exemption for the Catalyst development, including below-market housing units and a planned medical centre. Councillors supporting the bylaw described the exemption as time-limited support for non-profit housing; one noted that the exemption would be phased out by 2030. The public had questioned whether the exemption was needed and whether it would shift costs onto homeowners. The transcript records a unanimous vote after a motion to adopt the bylaw, but the official motions list instead records a motion to receive the application and a separate motion for first, second and third readings of an amended bylaw. The transcript does not capture those official motions as worded.

Agreement
  • Councillors acknowledged that the tax exemption had been debated previously and considered its connection to below-market housing and the planned medical centre.
Disagreement
  • Public speakers argued against the exemption, citing tax pressure on homeowners and questioning whether it was necessary for the medical centre.
  • Councillors who supported the bylaw viewed the time-limited exemption as a way to support non-profit housing.
Carried 5 to 02026-304Item 10.3

Routine: receive Catalyst's tax-exemption application for information.

Official wording: THAT Council receive the Permissive Tax Exemption Application from Catalyst for information.
Carried 5 to 02026-305Item 10.3

Give three readings to the tax-exemption bylaw, amended so that the exemption for 30% of the property's residential portion phases out by 2030. Staff must publish the required notice before Council considers adopting the bylaw.

Official wording: THAT Council give FIRST, SECOND and THIRD readings to Permissive Tax Exemption Bylaw No. 949, 2026 as amended by altering section 3(a) to read “notwithstanding any other provision of this Bylaw, the permissive tax exemptions granted to the 30% of the residential class 1 of the property shall be phased out by 2030”; AND THAT Council direct staff to give notice of the proposed bylaw in accordance with section 227 of the Community Charter prior to Council considering adoption.

15 ADJOURN TO CLOSED MEETING

governance2:32:05 Watch · Read

Council closed the meeting to the public to receive advice subject to solicitor-client privilege. The official motions list records the motion as carried, but the transcript does not capture a result declaration.

Carried 5 to 02026-306Item 15

Routine: close the public meeting at 8:26 p.m. so Council can receive advice protected by solicitor-client privilege.

Official wording: THAT Council close the July 27, 2026 meeting to the public pursuant to the following subsection of the Community Charter, time being 8:26 p.m.: 90(1)(i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose;

Decisions

Official · from the minutes

All 18 decisions from the minutes appear under the agenda items above.