Council approved a cannabis shop at 2579 Cadboro Bay Road and asked staff to prepare a report on a broader retail policy. The sharpest dispute was over a proposed five-storey, 16-home building at 2090 Cadboro Bay Road: council first rejected a proposal to send it back for more work, then voted to deny the application. Other decisions included appointing a new chief financial officer, approving three property variances and advancing a heritage agreement amendment after learning part of the protected house had already been removed. Council also approved $2,500 for a Songhees Nation elders lunch and backed advocacy for continued funding of the Mobile Youth Services Team.
Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.
An Oak Bay resident urged council to stick to the Official Community Plan (OCP), especially during the election period, and not approve proposals that depart from it. The speaker cited a Woodburn development that, they said, left a neighbour dealing with the relocation of a high-use power line and transformer.
6.1 2579 Cadboro Bay Road: Zoning Bylaw Amendment (ZON00069)
Council considered a site-specific zoning change to allow non-medical cannabis sales in the existing Liquor Plus premises in Cadboro Bay Village. Councillors raised written concerns about the store’s location and proximity to a school; staff said those concerns had been considered, but noted that comparing one type of retail business with another is difficult. Council approved the zoning change through adoption, then asked staff to prepare a report for the next council after the election on what a district-wide cannabis retail policy would involve. The report is to cover approval steps and possible zoning changes; it does not itself approve or reject other stores.
Agreement
Council approved the site-specific zoning change without opposition.
Council agreed that a report on a possible district-wide policy would help explain the approval process for future applications.
Disagreement
Councillor Green raised residents’ concerns about the location and proximity to a school. The mayor said he was personally not in favour of the change but considered it a reasonable request from the business owner.
A councillor questioned whether a policy was warranted for what may be rare applications; another councillor argued that a clear process would help council assess future requests.
Ask staff to report on a possible policy for non-medical cannabis stores in Oak Bay, including how provincial and municipal approvals work and what zoning changes might be needed.
Official wording: That Council direct staff to prepare a report on establishing a non-medical cannabis retail store policy for the District of Oak Bay including an outline of the provincial and municipal approval processes and potential amendments to the District’s Zoning Bylaw required to implement such a policy.
Council ended Michelle Hunt’s interim appointment as chief financial officer and appointed Jennifer Lockhart to the role. The mayor welcomed Lockhart, noting her 11 years of senior local-government experience, most recently with the District of Saanich.
Agreement
Council approved the appointment without opposition.
End Michelle Hunt’s interim appointment and appoint Jennifer Lockhart as Oak Bay’s Chief Financial Officer.
Official wording: That Council:
Rescind the appointment of Michelle Hunt as Interim Chief Financial Officer for the District of Oak Bay.
Appoint Jennifer Lockhart as Chief Financial Officer for the District of Oak Bay.
7.2 2090 Cadboro Bay Road: Official Community Plan Amendment (OCP00012) and Zoning Bylaw Amendment (ZON00061)
zoning development1 public speaker34:59 Watch · Read
The proposal was for a five-storey mixed-use building with 16 strata homes, including two intended for below-market sale through Habitat for Humanity or a similar organization, and ground-floor commercial space. The applicant said the fifth storey was necessary to make the project financially viable and described the site as well suited to fewer parking spaces because of nearby shops, services, transit and walking routes. Councillors questioned the parking study, stormwater plan, commercial use, affordable-housing arrangement, building setbacks and fire-service concerns about a single exit stair. A motion to refer the application back to staff for work on these and other issues failed. Council then denied the application in its current form, including the requested OCP change and related zoning and development permit applications.
Agreement
Councillors acknowledged the site’s access to shops, recreation, active transportation and transit as relevant to whether it could accommodate housing.
Council agreed that the application raised substantial unresolved questions about parking, servicing, design and the proposed affordable homes.
Disagreement
Councillors Appleton, Watson and Smart supported sending the application back for further work; Councillors Braithwaite, Green and Paterson and the mayor opposed that referral.
Councillors Appleton, Watson and Smart opposed denying the application, while Councillors Braithwaite, Green and Paterson and the mayor supported denial.
Supporters said the neighbourhood-village designation warranted considering more homes at this location and that a return to staff could resolve outstanding details. Opponents said the five-storey proposal departed too far from the recently adopted OCP, had too many unresolved elements and was too large for the small lot.
Send the development applications back to staff and the applicant to work through concerns about access, parking, car-sharing, commercial space, affordable housing, waste collection, building design, and improvements to the street frontage and laneway.
Official wording: That Council refer the applications for Official Community Plan Amendment (OCP00012), Zoning Bylaw Amendment (ZON00061) and Development Permit (DP00061) for the property located at 2090 Cadboro Bay Road back to staff to work with the applicant to address the following:
Parking configuration, including exploring access, parking and servicing of the proposed development from the existing laneway.
Potential inaccuracies in the Parking Study and proposed additional TDM measures to further mitigate potential parking impacts.
Further details on the location, logistics and proposed agreement for proposed car-sharing space and vehicle.
Determining suitable and feasible commercial uses for the ground floor.
Confirmation of the proposed agreement with Habitat for Humanity for two affordable units.
Further information on the logistics of waste collection, including frequency and location of pick-up and the capacity and suitability of waste management to service both residential and commercial uses.
Exterior design changes to improve articulation and use of materials.
Frontage improvements, including a bus shelter and potential road dedication along Cadboro Bay Road and upgrading the laneway.
Deny the proposed Official Community Plan change, zoning change, and development permit for 2090 Cadboro Bay Road.
Official wording: 1. That Official Community Plan Amendment application (OCP00012) for the property located at 2090 Cadboro Bay Road be denied.
2. That Zoning Bylaw Amendment application (ZON00061) and Development Permit application (DP00061) for the property located at 2090 Cadboro Bay Road be denied.
The permit would allow an existing shed to remain despite its non-compliance with side-yard setback and building-separation rules. Staff described the variances as minor and said the shed was screened from the street and suited the home. No one spoke during the public input period, and council approved the permit.
Council approved a variance for a new covered entrance on an older, legally non-conforming home and for retaining and repairing an existing greenhouse. It also approved the Uplands siting and design permit for the renovations. Councillors welcomed the modest changes, with one thanking the applicants for preserving the home.
Agreement
Council approved both permits without opposition.
Councillors praised the renovation as a way to give the older home new life.
8.3 1059 Roslyn Road: Development Variance Permit (DVP00194)
zoning development1 public speaker1:54:15 Watch · Read
The application sought permission to keep a heat pump within the required setback beside a rear lane. Staff recommended approval if the owner installed a rear fence or provided a screening design acceptable to the planning director. The applicant said the unit had been placed there to keep the heating system efficient and preserve access and landscaping, and offered to provide a surround. Councillors discussed how heat pumps should be sited and screened in future, as well as the unit’s visibility and startup noise. Council approved the variance subject to the recommended screening condition.
Agreement
Council approved the variance with a requirement for a fence or an acceptable visual-screening design.
Councillors stressed that clear guidance on heat-pump placement can help residents avoid similar problems.
Approve the requested variance for 1059 Roslyn Road, provided a rear fence is installed or a heat-pump screening design acceptable to the Director is submitted.
Official wording: That Council approve Development Variance Permit DVP00194 for the property located at 1059 Roslyn Road subject to the installation of a new fence along the rear property line, or the submission of a visual screening design for the heat pump to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Building and Planning.
Staff reported that the rear wing of the protected heritage house had been removed on May 19, before council had approved the proposed agreement amendment. The owner had understood an earlier council direction to prepare bylaws as permission to proceed; staff issued a stop-work order after inspecting the site. Staff said the existing agreement remained in force and that, if the amendment were denied, council would need to direct staff to enforce it. Council gave the amendment bylaw first, second and third readings, with Councillor Braithwaite opposed. Staff expected the bylaw to return for adoption at a later meeting, likely July 20.
Agreement
Council advanced the amendment bylaw through third reading.
Disagreement
Councillor Braithwaite opposed both reading motions; the other recorded votes carried.
Give the proposed heritage agreement amendment its first and second readings.
Official wording: That "1587 York Place/1562 Prospect Place Heritage Revitalization Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4885, 2025, Amendment Bylaw No. 4975, 2026" be read a first and second time.
Give the proposed heritage agreement amendment its third reading.
Official wording: That "1587 York Place/1562 Prospect Place Heritage Revitalization Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4885, 2025, Amendment Bylaw No. 4975, 2026" be read a third time.
Council received a Songhees Nation request for support for the Island Elders Lunch, an event hosted for elders from other First Nations. Council then approved a $2,500 contribution from the Grant in Aid budget, matching the amount provided on previous occasions. Councillors also asked staff to seek more information about attendance and sponsorship options for future requests.
Agreement
Councillors supported contributing to the event and recognised its role in building relationships.
Council approved $2,500 from the Grant in Aid budget without opposition.
Routine: receive the Songhees Nation’s letter requesting sponsorship for the Island Elders Lunch.
Official wording: That the correspondence dated June 5, 2026 from Chief Sam, Songhees Nation, regarding a sponsorship request for the Island Elders Lunch, be received.
Council received a request concerning the Mobile Youth Services Team (MYST), a regional team pairing a social worker with a police officer to work with at-risk youth. Councillor Paterson moved that the mayor write to the Capital Regional District Board, the Minister of Public Safety and the Solicitor General to affirm Oak Bay’s support for the integrated team, including its civilian counsellor position. Council supported the letter unanimously. The mayor said regional discussions were under way about how the counsellor role might be funded, after its funding had become uncertain.
Agreement
Council backed a letter affirming support for MYST and its civilian counsellor position.
Councillors thanked Councillor Paterson for her work on the issue.
Routine: receive the Pacific Centre Family Services Association’s letter about support for the Mobile Youth Services Team.
Official wording: That the correspondence dated June 30, 2026 from J. Leggett, Pacific Centre Family Services Association, regarding support for the Mobile Youth Services Team, be received.
Ask the Mayor to write to the regional board and provincial officials confirming Oak Bay’s support for the integrated police unit, including its civilian counsellor position.
Official wording: That Council direct the Mayor to send correspondence to the Capital Regional District Board, Minister of Public Safety, and Solicitor General affirming Oak Bay support for the integrated police unit including the civilian counsellor position.
Routine: adopt the minutes of the two June 22, 2026 Council meetings.
Official wording: That the following minutes be adopted
Regular Council Meeting held on June 22, 2026 at 5:00 PM; and
Regular Council Meeting held on June 22, 2026 at 7:00 PM