City Government Watcher
All Langford meetings

Special Council Meeting - 2026/08/17

City of Langford · Mon, Aug 17, 2026 18:00 · Council Chambers & Electronic Meeting

AgendaMinutesVideoTranscript
Watch the meetingOfficial minutesOfficial agenda

Summary

AI summary · check against sources

Council heard draft plans for climate action and housing, with both scheduled for public review before returning to Council. The climate plan forecasts emissions in 2050 would be 21% below 2007 levels if its actions are implemented, but still short of net zero; it proposes new per-person targets that differ from the regional pathway. The housing discussion focused on the gap between the homes Langford is building and the homes people need, especially affordable family-sized homes, and on how limited municipal land and uncertain senior-government funding constrain the City’s options. Council also advanced fire, zoning, parks, reserve-fund and housing-agreement bylaws, and supported a request for the province to restore funding to the ARC Foundation.

Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.

What was discussed

AI summary · check against sources

5.1 Draft Climate Action Plan

parks environment4:12 Watch · Read

Staff and consultants presented a draft plan developed over about 10 months. The analysis found that community emissions rose 54% from 2007 to 2024, while emissions per person fell 35%; more than 80% of current emissions come from buildings, transportation and waste. If the proposed actions are implemented, emissions are projected to be 21% below 2007 levels in 2050, but that would not reach net zero. The draft proposes targets of an 80% per-person emissions reduction by 2050, with a 65% interim reduction by 2035; municipal corporate targets are 40% by 2035 and net zero by 2050. The plan also identifies wildfire, extreme heat, poor air quality, landslides and flooding as high risks, and sets out 61 actions across five strategies. Staff expected to post the draft for public review within about two weeks, then bring it back to Council after considering feedback.

Agreement
  • Council members welcomed the work and recognized that municipal operations account for less than 1% of community emissions, so progress will require action by residents, businesses and other governments as well as the City.
  • The plan’s emissions analysis includes contracted facilities and services in the corporate emissions figures.
  • Council and staff agreed that climate risks and costs should be considered across City departments and in future budgeting.
Disagreement
  • A councillor questioned how the cost of climate action should be balanced against the cost of inaction and asked whether cost savings could be built into financial modelling.
  • A councillor raised concern that the proposed per-person targets differ from the Capital Regional District pathway; staff said Langford’s growth and projected emissions were the basis for the proposed targets.

5.2 Draft Housing Strategy

housing50:26 Watch · Read

The draft strategy sets out a 20-year direction for housing and responds to a projected need for about 17,000 additional homes by 2045. The province’s five-year target is 2,993 homes, with a strong emphasis on rental and below-market housing. The consultants highlighted a shortage of affordable homes with three or more bedrooms, and the need to place new homes near transit, services and amenities. Four proposed priority actions include pre-zoning for key housing types, incentives for family-sized homes, a staff liaison to help housing applicants navigate City processes, and clearer use of grants, fee waivers and reserve funds for affordable housing. Council heard that the City has limited land and cannot control who owns or manages rental buildings; partnerships with non-profit providers and predictable City support were identified as available tools. The draft was expected to go out for public comment in late August and return to Council, with revisions, on September 21.

Agreement
  • Council and the presenters identified affordable housing, including larger homes for families, as a significant local need.
  • Members supported a clearer, easier-to-navigate approvals process for non-profit, seniors, co-op and other less conventional housing proposals.
  • Council agreed that the City’s influence is limited and that provincial and federal funding and partnerships will be important to delivering below-market homes.
Disagreement
  • A councillor raised concern that the province’s rental-focused targets could leave residents exposed to the risks of large investment firms owning rental housing; staff said the City has no tool to require local ownership, though it can secure rental tenure through agreements or zoning.
  • A councillor questioned how the City could deliver below-market housing with little municipal land, growing park needs and reduced senior-government funding. The presenters said the strategy identifies a suite of tools but does not prescribe exactly how each affordable project will be funded.
  • A councillor asked whether some below-market rental targets could be met with below-market ownership homes; staff said the provincial reporting categories cannot be reallocated, although the City can report such projects as additional context.

7 CONSENT AGENDA

governance1:50:24 Watch · Read

Council adopted the consent agenda recommendations, including the July 20 Council minutes and receipt of the two draft committee meeting minutes.

Carried 6 to 0Item 71:50:24 Watch · Read

Routine: adopt the July 20 Council minutes and receive the draft minutes from the July 28 Community Advisory Committee and August 10 Sustainable Development Advisory Committee meetings.

Official wording: THAT Council adopt the recommendations for each item of the Consent Agenda as presented: Minutes of the Council Meeting - July 20, 2026 (ADOPT) Draft Minutes of the Community Advisory Committee Meeting - July 28, 2026 (RECEIVE) Draft Minutes of the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee Meeting - August 10, 2026 (RECEIVE)
Moved by HARDER, seconded by GUIRY.

8.1.1 Proposed Fire Prevention and Regulation Bylaw No. 1665, 2026

public safety1:50:24 Watch · Read

Council considered the Community Advisory Committee’s recommendation to advance the new Fire Prevention and Regulation Bylaw and a related miscellaneous amending bylaw to readings. Members referred to the committee’s earlier discussion about updating older rules and consolidating fire-related provisions. The discussion also noted that work is underway to make the City’s bylaws easier for the public to find. Fire staff advised that residents with fire-safety concerns should contact the fire department first; open burning still requires a permit during set burn periods, and garbage burning is not allowed.

Agreement
  • Members supported consolidating and updating fire provisions so the public can more easily find the applicable rules.
  • The fire department is the recommended first contact for residents concerned about a potential fire hazard.
Carried 6 to 0Item 8.1.11:57:14 Watch · Read

Council is to consider giving three readings to a proposed fire prevention and regulation bylaw and a related bylaw making miscellaneous changes.

Official wording: THAT Council consider giving first, second and third reading to “Fire Prevention and Regulation Bylaw No. 1665, 2026”; AND THAT Council consider giving first, second and third reading to “Fire Prevention and Regulation Miscellaneous Amending Bylaw No. 2286, 2026”.
Moved by YACUCHA, seconded by HARDER.

8.2.1 Application for a Temporary Use Permit at #107-2317 Millstream Road

zoning development1:57:14 Watch · Read

Council directed staff to notify the public that Council will consider a temporary use permit allowing Honeycomb Cannabis Inc. to continue operating a non-medical cannabis retail store at Unit 107, 2317 Millstream Road. A councillor said the City has used this temporary-permit process for cannabis stores and that the business had received no complaints.

Agreement
  • The motion to give public notice was carried.
Carried 6 to 0Item 8.2.11:58:16 Watch · Read

Staff will notify the public that Council will consider a permit allowing Honeycomb Cannabis to keep operating its non-medical cannabis retail store at Unit 107-2317 Millstream Road.

Official wording: THAT Council direct staff to provide notice that Council will consider issuing a Temporary Use Permit to allow Honeycomb Cannabis Inc to continue to operate a non-medical cannabis retail store at Unit 107-2317 Millstream Road.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

9.1 TUP26-0005 - 4373 West Shore Parkway

zoning development1:58:16 Watch · Read

Council issued a temporary use permit allowing the adjacent Galaxy Motors RV dealership to receive, prepare and store recreational vehicles on the site at 4373 West Shore Parkway without meeting the 10% minimum lot coverage requirement. Members described this as support for an existing business in an industrial area and noted there had been no particular complaints.

Agreement
  • Members who spoke supported continuing the existing use through the temporary permit.
Carried 6 to 0Item 9.12:00:16 Watch · Read

The permit would let Galaxy Motors use the site at 4373 West Shore Parkway to receive, prepare and store recreational vehicles for sale at its dealership next door, without building a structure to meet the usual minimum lot coverage. The site must have no razor wire, a 10-pound dry chemical fire extinguisher, a posted address and an access lane for fire suppression.

Official wording: THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP26-0005 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to Mark Jones of Galaxy Motors (0698721 BC Ltd.) to allow the land to be used for receiving, preparing and storage of recreational vehicles for sale at the applicant’s RV Dealership on the adjacent lot (4377 West Shore Parkway) without building a structure that meets the 10% minimum lot coverage, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Conditions The following requirements are imposed pursuant to section 493 of the Local Government Act : a) No razor wire fencing; b) At least 10lb dry chemical fire extinguisher must be available on site at all times; c) Address for the site to be posted as per City of Langford bylaw; and d) Maintain an access lane on site for fire suppression for the duration.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

9.2 TUP26-0006 - 890 Goldstream Avenue

community services2 public speakers2:00:16 Watch · Read

Council issued a temporary use permit for Code Ninjas Westshore to continue running an after-school computer-coding program for children on the lower floor of the front unit at 890 Goldstream Avenue. Two members of the public spoke in support, describing the program as a valuable local opportunity for children to learn coding, problem-solving and other practical skills. Council members also cited the site’s location near schools and City Hall.

Agreement
  • Council members and the two public speakers supported continuing the program at this location.
Carried 6 to 0Item 9.22:02:11 Watch · Read

The permit would allow Code Ninjas Westshore to continue its after-school computer coding program for children in the lower floor of the front unit at 890 Goldstream Avenue, following the attached site plan. It would be issued only to Jesse Bowness for three years and could not be transferred to another business or owner.

Official wording: THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP26-0006 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to Jesse Bowness of Code Ninjas Westshore on behalf of David Baird to allow the continued use of an afterschool computer coding program for children on the lower floor of the front unit of 890 Goldstream Ave subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Appendix The site shall be developed in accordance with the site plan attached (Appendix A). 2. Conditions The following requirements are imposed under Section 498 of the Local Government Act : a) That the Temporary Use Permit be issued only to Jesse Bowness, doing business as Code Ninjas Westshore and not be transferred to any subsequent business or business owner should Code Ninjas Westshore cease to operate; and b) That the Temporary Use Permit be issued for a period of three years from time of issuance.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

10.1 Notice of Motion from July 20, 2026

community services1 public speaker2:02:11 Watch · Read

Council supported writing to the provincial Minister of Education and Child Care and the local member of the Legislative Assembly to ask the province to restore funding to the ARC Foundation and affirm the importance of its SOGI 123 resources. A councillor said the funding cut of about $350,000 had forced the foundation to reduce staffing by three people, and argued that teachers need reliable resources to support safe and inclusive schools. Another councillor described the resources as important to students’ sense of safety and belonging. One public speaker also supported sending the letter.

Agreement
  • All councillors who spoke supported asking the province to restore funding.
  • Members emphasized the value of school resources that promote safety, respect and inclusion for students.
Carried 6 to 0Item 10.12:13:56 Watch · Read

The City would write to the provincial Education and Childcare Minister and MLA Ravi Parmar asking the ministry to restore funding for the ARC Foundation and affirm the value of SOGI 123. The letter would support continued access to classroom resources that promote safety and inclusion for students of all sexual orientations and gender identities, and students from diverse families.

Official wording: WHEREAS, the ARC Foundation developed SOGI 123 in collaboration with the B.C. Ministry of Education, B.C. Teachers' Federation, The University of British Columbia's faculty of education, Out in Schools, nine school districts throughout B.C., and local, national and international LGBTQ community organizations and SOGI 123 has been used in BC schools since 2016; AND WHEREAS, the ARC Foundation works with school districts to provide SOGI 123 resources which are a set of tools that teachers can use to ensure their classrooms are accepting and rooted in respect and belonging; AND WHEREAS, the ARC Foundation has had to address a significant funding gap by reducing staffing levels as of July 2026 due to the recent discontinuation of funding by the BC Ministry of Education and Childcare; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Langford Mayor and Council to direct staff to write a letter to the Minister of Education and Childcare and MLA Ravi Parmar, asking that the ministry reinstate funding to the ARC Foundation and affirm the importance of the SOGI 123 program so that school districts will continue to work with the ARC Foundation to access resources to create a safe and inclusive environment for all students, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, or the diversity in their own families.
Moved by GUIRY, seconded by MORLEY.

11.1 BYLAW NO. 1665

public safety2:14:43 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to the new Fire Prevention and Regulation Bylaw. Members said the bylaw was a substantial update, informed by work in other municipalities and intended to clarify and consolidate rules alongside the Fire Safety Act.

Agreement
  • Members who spoke supported the update and credited staff and the fire chief with the work behind it.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.12:16:13 Watch · Read

Council would give the proposed fire prevention and regulation bylaw its first three readings.

Official wording: THAT Council give “Fire Prevention and Regulation Bylaw No. 1665, 2026”, first, second and third readings.
Moved by YACUCHA, seconded by HARDER.

11.2 BYLAW NO. 2286

public safety2:16:13 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to the related Fire Prevention and Regulation Miscellaneous Amending Bylaw. Members said the committee discussion had already covered the changes.

Carried 6 to 0Item 11.22:17:09 Watch · Read

Council would give the related fire regulation amendments bylaw its first three readings.

Official wording: THAT Council give “Fire Prevention and Regulation Miscellaneous Amending Bylaw No. 2286, 2026”, first second and third readings.
Moved by YACUCHA, seconded by HARDER.

11.3 BYLAW NO. 2110

zoning development2:17:09 Watch · Read

Council adopted the zoning amendment for 854 Latoria Road. A councillor noted that the property currently has a house and that a portion of the lot is being subdivided; a future development proposal would need to return for rezoning.

Carried 6 to 0Item 11.32:17:56 Watch · Read

Council would adopt the zoning change for 854 Latoria Road.

Official wording: That Council adopt “Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 696, (854 Latoria Road), Bylaw No. 2110, 2026" as presented.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

11.4 BYLAW NO. 2236

zoning development2:17:56 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to the zoning amendment for 709, 711, 715, 719 and 721 Massie Drive. The current proposal is for a six-storey residential building. Staff clarified that a 12-storey or mixed-use proposal would require another zoning amendment and Council process, even though the Official Community Plan allows for buildings up to 12 storeys in the broader area. Members also noted nearby parkland, planned landscaping and amenity space, and the site’s access to the 95 bus route and E&N Trail.

Agreement
  • Members acknowledged traffic concerns raised during committee discussion and pointed to transportation planning and active-transportation connections as part of addressing them.
  • Members supported making clear that a substantially different building proposal would need to return through a zoning amendment process.
Disagreement
  • Traffic and the impact of added downtown density on Massie Drive had been concerns in committee; a councillor said those concerns should be recognized even while supporting the application.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.42:22:48 Watch · Read

Council would give the proposed zoning change for the listed Massie Drive properties its first three readings.

Official wording: THAT Council give “Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, Amendment No. 752 (709, 711, 715, 719, 721 Massie Drive), Bylaw No. 2236, 2026", first, second and third readings.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

11.5 BYLAW NO. 2278

zoning development2:22:48 Watch · Read

Council adopted the zoning amendment for 3084, 3088, 3094 and 3096 Jacklin Road. Members said the application had been discussed earlier and noted a further effort to secure as much bicycle parking as possible.

Agreement
  • Members supported adoption and welcomed efforts to maximize bicycle parking.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.52:24:29 Watch · Read

Council would adopt the zoning change for the listed Jacklin Road properties.

Official wording: That Council adopt “Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, Amendment No. 762 (3084, 3088, 3094/3096 Jacklin Road), Bylaw No. 2278, 2026" as presented.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

11.6 BYLAW NO. 2288

parks environment2:24:29 Watch · Read

Council adopted the Park Dedication Bylaw. Members welcomed the dedication of City parks, including Veterans Memorial Park, and said the bylaw protects the listed parks in perpetuity unless residents approve a change through a formal assent process or referendum.

Agreement
  • Members supported permanently protecting the dedicated parks.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.62:26:10 Watch · Read

Council would formally dedicate the land covered by the park dedication bylaw as park land.

Official wording: THAT Council adopt “City of Langford Park Dedication Bylaw No. 2288, 2026”.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by HARDER.

11.7 BYLAW NO. 2291

budget finance2:26:10 Watch · Read

Council rescinded the bylaw’s previous third reading and gave a new third reading to the revised Parks Development Cost Charge Bylaw. Staff said the change was to make the rules clearer and ensure the charge is applied consistently.

Agreement
  • Members described the revision as a housekeeping clarification and supported making the bylaw easier to apply consistently.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.72:27:47 Watch · Read

Council would withdraw its earlier third reading of the parks development charge bylaw and give a third reading to its revised version.

Official wording: THAT Council: Rescind third reading of “City of Langford Parks Development Cost Charge Bylaw No. 2291, 2026”; AND Give third reading to the revised “City of Langford Parks Development Cost Charge Bylaw No. 2291, 2026” as presented.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

11.8 BYLAW NO. 2292

governance2:27:47 Watch · Read

Council gave first reading to an omnibus amendment to the Official Community Plan. It incorporates the recently approved parks, transportation, economic development and agriculture strategies so the City’s long-term planning documents align. Staff said another housekeeping amendment is expected after draft plans, including the climate plan, are finalized.

Agreement
  • Members welcomed having approved strategies reflected in the City’s main long-term planning document.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.82:31:01 Watch · Read

Council would give the proposed Official Community Plan amendment its first reading.

Official wording: THAT Council give first reading to “Langford Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2200, Amendment No. 2 (Omnibus No. 1), Bylaw 2292, 2026”.
Moved by MORLEY, seconded by GUIRY.

11.9 BYLAW NO. 2294

budget finance2:31:01 Watch · Read

Council adopted an amendment to the City’s reserve-fund bylaw establishing a dedicated reserve for asset management of the Langford Aquatic Centre. Members said the change makes clear that any profits associated with the YMCA partnership can be kept in Langford for municipal purposes.

Agreement
  • Members supported setting aside funds for the aquatic centre’s asset needs and keeping any profits in the municipality.
Carried 6 to 0Item 11.92:33:45 Watch · Read

Council would adopt an amendment to the bylaw that establishes the City's reserve funds.

Official wording: THAT Council adopt "City of Langford Reserve Fund Establishment Bylaw, 2004, Bylaw No. 857, Amendment No. 4, Bylaw No. 2294, 2026".
Moved by HARDER, seconded by WAGNER.

11.10 BYLAW NO. 2296

housing2:33:45 Watch · Read

Council gave first, second and third readings to the housing agreement bylaw for 2615 Sooke Road. A councillor welcomed the agreement as a way for the City’s housing plans and policies to support affordable housing in practice.

Carried 6 to 0Item 11.102:34:41 Watch · Read

Council would give the proposed housing agreement for 2615 Sooke Road its first three readings.

Official wording: THAT Council give "City of Langford Housing Agreement (2615 Sooke Road) Bylaw No. 2296, 2026", first, second and third readings.
Moved by WAGNER, seconded by GUIRY.

12 IN CAMERA RESOLUTION

governance2:34:41 Watch · Read

Council voted to close the meeting to the public to consider the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements where disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the municipality’s interests. The closed session began at 8:36 p.m.

Carried 6 to 0Item 122:34:41 Watch · Read

Council would move into a closed meeting to discuss a land matter where public disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the City's interests.

Official wording: THAT Council close the meeting at 8:36 pm to the public pursuant to section 90 (1) (e) of the Community Charter to consider: the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality.
Moved by YACUCHA, seconded by HARDER.

13 ADJOURNMENT

governance

The official motions list records that Council adjourned at 8:59 p.m.; the transcript provided ends as Council went into the closed session and does not include the adjournment.

Carried 6 to 0Item 13

Routine: end the meeting.

Official wording: THAT Council adjourn the meeting at 8:59 pm.
Moved by YACUCHA, seconded by GUIRY.

Decisions

Official · from the minutes

All 19 decisions from the minutes appear under the agenda items above.