Council approved the 2026–2030 draft Financial Plan, sending it forward for a bylaw, after adding requests for clearer capital priorities and more information about civic-facility costs. The biggest dispute was whether to ask staff to find a way to hold the property-tax increase to 6.5%; that motion failed, with the mayor arguing that the plan funds needed infrastructure and that a small reduction would save little per household. Council also voted to reject an $82,000 increase in the police dispatch budget and ask the Police Board to find equivalent savings, while requesting a presentation from E-Comm. The plan sets out $142 million in five-year capital spending, including infrastructure renewal, sewer and water work, and active transportation projects.
Generated from the recording's captions and the official minutes.
What was discussed
AI summary · check against sources
3.1 Agenda of the April 8, 2026 Special (Open) Council Meeting
The mayor called the meeting to order and the agenda was approved without debate. The meeting opened with regrets from Councillors Graham and King; the mayor said Councillor Newton was expected shortly.
Staff presented a five-year plan with $142 million in capital spending. The district’s assets include more than 46 municipal buildings, 140 kilometres of roads, water and sewer networks, and parks; staff said current funding covers about 70% of annual asset-replacement costs, with a goal of full funding by 2032. Planned work includes water-main replacements, completion of Phase 2 of the Brentwood Bay sewer project, design work for the Mount Newton multi-use path, and repairs and planning for Keating Road. Councillors questioned how rising construction costs, debt limits and uncertain land-sale revenue could affect the plan. Staff said the $17 million land-sale estimate for the civic-facility project remains the original forecast; if it falls short, options include facility reserves, borrowing or higher taxes. Councillors also asked for clearer separation of core renewal work from discretionary projects and better forecasts of the civic facility’s operating and lifecycle costs. The Committee of the Whole approved the plan with amendments and directed the Chief Financial Officer to prepare the bylaw.
Agreement
Staff should report back ahead of the 2027 budget-planning session with a schedule that distinguishes core from discretionary capital projects, alongside the planned review of costs.
Before the financial-plan bylaw is prepared, staff should provide more information on civic-facility lifecycle costs and future operating costs, with past facility costs as a useful baseline.
Council supported proceeding with the draft plan, as amended, and having the Chief Financial Officer draft the 2026–2030 Financial Plan Bylaw.
Disagreement
A councillor sought a staff report on what a property-tax increase capped at 6.5% would require. The mayor argued that the plan was already disciplined, that cuts could mean service reductions, and that the household savings from a small reduction would be minimal. The motion was defeated, with Councillors Riddell and Paltiel and the mayor opposed.
A councillor moved to reject the $82,000 increase in police dispatch services and require equivalent savings from the Police Board. Councillors Riddle and the mayor opposed; other councillors supported the motion. Staff and the mayor clarified that Council could reduce the budget but could not direct the Police Board to withhold payment from E-Comm.
Councillors raised concerns about whether projected civic-facility land-sale revenue would materialize and whether relying on reserves, debt or taxes to make up a shortfall would be consistent with the stated goal of avoiding new taxes.
Before Council begins planning the 2027 budget, staff will report on how the District classifies capital projects as core or discretionary, alongside the 2027 cost review.
Official wording: That ahead of the 2027 District’s budget planning session, that staff report back on the capital categorization schedule for core vs. discretionary projects, in line with 2027 review of costs.
Before the 2026 Financial Plan is approved, staff will provide projections for civic facilities that show debt, capital needs and ongoing operating costs over the next 3, 5 and 10 years.
Official wording: That ahead of approval of the 2026 draft Financial Plan, that staff report back with information on the civic facilities, based on current projection plans and forecasts, the lifecycle costs regarding debt, capital requirements, and ongoing operating for 3, 5, and 10 years.
Council will not approve the $82,000 increase for E-Comm dispatch services in the Police Board budget, so the Police Board will need to find $82,000 in savings elsewhere.
Official wording: That Council do not approve the $82,000 increase in the E-Comm dispatch budget services and therefore the Police Board must find the equivalent savings.
Staff will be asked to propose a budget change that would limit the property tax increase to 6.5% or less.
Official wording: That staff be requested to report back to Council with a proposed amendment to the budget to have the property tax increase be no more than 6.5%.
Approve the amended draft financial plan for 2026–2030 and have the Chief Financial Officer prepare the bylaw for that plan.
Official wording: 1. Approve the 2026-2030 draft Financial Plan as amended; and Direct the Chief Financial Officer to draft the 2026-2030 Financial Plan Bylaw.
After the Committee of the Whole adjourned, Council moved to ratify its motions. The transcript records a motion to ratify the three Committee of the Whole motions and shows it carried without opposition.
Agreement
Council ratified the Committee of the Whole motions without opposition.
Council adopted together the three Committee of the Whole motions: have staff report on core and discretionary capital project categories for 2027 planning; provide civic-facility debt, capital and operating cost projections for 3, 5 and 10 years; and approve the amended 2026–2030 draft Financial Plan and have the Chief Financial Officer draft its bylaw.
Official wording: 1. That ahead of the 2027 District’s budget planning session, that staff report back on the capital categorization schedule for core vs. discretionary projects, in line with 2027 review of costs.
2. That ahead of approval of the 2026 draft Financial Plan, that staff report back with information on the civic facilities, based on current projection plans and forecasts, the lifecycle costs regarding debt, capital requirements, and ongoing operating for 3, 5, and 10 years.
3. Approve the 2026-2030 draft Financial Plan as amended; and Direct the Chief Financial Officer to draft the 2026-2030 Financial Plan bylaw.